If price is not a concern, in 2016 the best 65 inch TV money can buy is the LG OLED65B6P. Its picture quality is superior to any LED TVs we have reviewed no matter. Industry information at your fingertips. Over 200,000 Hollywood insiders. Enhance your IMDb Page. Use the picture settings in my Review listed at the end and the Samsung un55d7000 will look awesome. First off I notice major black light bleed out of the box & even. Http:// - Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Movie Clip - Do You Bleed? Sony 2. 01. 6 4. K HDR TVs - TVseddieaus writes.. I'm bit confused with X9. Zack Snyder's BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE is in theaters March 25, 2016. D and X9. 4D, is X9. D worse than X9. 3D? Slim backlight drive for X9. D, and backlight master drive for X9. D? It would seem so. It says it the X9. D has all the features of the X9. D except for the backlight. The X9. 40. D is only available in 7. I have 6. 5X9. 30. C and its junk to be honest. From software, to hardware to customer support!! People in other thread arguing I'm being too picky but I expect the best when I'm promised the best and pay the most. Probably just unlucky and ended up with a dud. O. P. Barry Jones Snr writes.. What does . At this stage, it's going to be inconsistent what is and isn't . Most of the cameras aren't recording for Rec. Rec. 2. 02. 0 yet. Some are, most aren't. This is in addition to 4k and 8k, 3. D and HDR. It's been around for a while, and the colour space is compressed (s. RGB) using YCC (which is even more technical). Suffice to say, 1. MPEG 4), and brighter LCD panels using LED backlighting. For UHD blurays, HEVC1. HEVC Main 1. 0, will use 1. HDR and the 4k blu- ray spec, expands the current 2. It's also going to have significantly more shades of green/blue than s. RGB which requires different TV panels to support the wider range of green and blues than a regular 4k TV panel is designed for. As a result, there's still going to be a lot of colour/codec hijinks and standards for HDR. Which is why everyone's putting . Loads of odd and competing standards just because it's 5x more colour information, doesn't mean people will agree on anything. Difficult, costly, and for the 5 or 1. But once on board, it's nice to have. QD panels might be able to get on the HDR train, but it's going to be tough because of the way that the panels need to support a more precise range of brightness values per pixel (to get that Dolby Vision / UHD BD / HDR BD approval). FALD screens might just be the only current Dolby HDR approved screens, but it's going to be a money/licensing thing, not a quality thing at this early stage because the technology is so new. Current HDR ready sets are using 1. It's unlikely to look good or support the full brightness / gamut range of HDR (or HDR1. Cheaper 4k TV's are highly likely (and equally unlikely) to also be HDR ready, like the hisense k. Dolby Vision currently prefers/uses Local/LED Array dimming as it can 'cheat' the HDR process by adjusting the overall brightness of an area, leading to more efficient colour usage in an area, but it's not OLED (and vice versa). In the future (when it becomes cheaper/easier to make OLED), there will be a 1. HDR standard using Rec. HDR or FHD/HDTV's 8- bit/1. And we'll all go through the process again. HDR is going to be a burden to support for compatibility. TV will still be dithering colour from the older 8- bit s. RGB (1. 6- 2. 35) and full s. RGB 2. 56 gamut HDTV recordings into 1. HDR 1. 02. 4 and 1. RGB /YCC colour displays. HDR is also going to reduce the amount of video that can be put onto a single BD, and also increase download sizes for streaming HDR movies, up to 2. HEVC1. 0. Most of the cameras aren't recording for Rec. Rec. 2. 02. 0 yet. At the very least there's a large quantity of films with DCI P3 that can be converted. It won't have the full gamut but it's better than 7. Yeah, there's about 5. UHD titles so far,and the different HDR codec/modes can probably be inserted into metadata in the HEVC files so users don't have to switch between HDR modes .. D movies .. It is, HDR and REC2. HDMI chain have to support or the source player will convert back down to 7. SDRNice 6. 5X9. 30. D . How will these display fta? So most of my viewing is free to air and then movies. How will these display fta? Picture will be brighter and the colours will be more saturated due to a more expansive colour gamut, so on face value it will look . Problem is, is that FTA on the whole is terrible quality. You will derive most benefit from the HDR capability of the tv when viewing 4. K Blu- ray and 4. K streaming content that is encoded with HDR, that's where there will be a discernible difference. FTA content TV will NOT be brighter unless you turn the TV up brighter, and since just about any modern LCD TV is capable if excessive brightness in most environments I fail to see why people would want . The display device is supposed to conform to the standards of the video being displayed and for free to air thats Rec. HD and Rec. 6. 01 for SD. If the display doesn't do that its either broken of is just crap because the use of a wider colour gamut than the video was mastered to results in horribly inaccurate colour. Why would anyone want that? Rec. 7. 09 encompasses 9. The most important colours like those found in skin tones are not affected. Even the colours that are affected will only look subtly different, so much so you are very unlikely to notice. When you go to the cinema do you notice the colour looks richer and more saturated than your TV? If anything the colour on your TV will look more saturated because its un calibrated and inaccurate even though the gamut is more restricted. If you want more saturated colour just turn up the colour control on any TV, that will give you more saturated colour at all levels rather than maybe 5% of colour in a handful of scenes that you will get with accurate DCI P3 (cinema colour). Macman. 1 writes.. FTA content TV will NOT be brighter. Wrong. The defining characteristic of the new 2. The vast majority of people buying tv's simply put them in Dynamic mode as that's what they saw in stores and that's what they want to replicate in their house. I'm going to take a guess here, but I'd say 0. Rec 7. 09. FTA TV colour will NOT be more saturated. Wrong again. Let's see if you can make it a hat trick ; )I haven't seen HDR yet (as far as I know), but it sounds like the next . So I'm highly doubtful this will be a . The defining characteristic of the new 2. After all the talk about HDR you still don't seem to understand it. The high peak output of HDR is ONLY for highlights which comprise only a tiny fraction of content, the average picture level and all levels under about 9. Rec. 7. 09. If we use the standard 2. Rec. 7. 09 8bit video with a display running 1. HDR. Not only will this be blinding but the picture will look wrong because it was mastered for 1. There will also be problems with posterisation (colour banding) because each step in video levels will be 1. Thats why HDR needs to be 1. So, no we CANT just display Rec. HD or Rec. 6. 01 SD video at 1. It may be possible to force the TV to do it but thats not how its supposed to work and it would look dreadful. Wrong again. Let's see if you can make it a hat trick ; )I explained what happens when the display gamut does not match the video gamut, its really BAD. Any good TV controls its gamut depending on the video its displaying, Rec. SD and Rec. 7. 09 gamut for HD. Good TV's have been doing this for 1. Its only cheap no name TV's that don't do it, they use the native gamut of the LCD panel, which has been wider than Rec. Rec. 7. 09 for MANY years, for everything. They don't do that with any of their current range because its wrong and looks like crap. So, free to air, DVD and Bluray colour should look EXACTLY the same on a 4. K HDR Sony as on a normal 1. Sony. The only differences will be due to lack of colour calibration which causes colour to be out of spec. Wrong. LOL you're just making stuff up now. Like Macman. 1 said no one is going to watch non- HDR 8- bit content at 1. It'll fry your eyeballs and the banding will be horrendous. That sorta brightness is only suitable for 1. HDR highlights. Macman. After all the talk about HDR you still don't seem to understand it. The high peak output of HDR is ONLY for highlights which comprise only a tiny fraction of content, the average picture level and all levels under about 9. Rec. 7. 09. Mate I've been saying this for a LONG time, you and others have been scaremongering by saying people are going to be blinded by HDR. Good to see you've seen the . You have to make presumptions, so he/she would be coming from an older tv. All tvs lose a portion of their light output over time, the more time the more it loses. A new 2. 01. 6 HDR tv will undoubtedly be brighter and have more colours and be more saturated than the tv it is replacing. So my comment on FTA being brighter and more vibrant stands and is correct. Once again, you try and turn this into a 1. K debate. Give it up mate. All tvs lose a portion of their light output over time, the more time the more it loses. A new 2. 01. 6 HDR tv will undoubtedly be brighter and have more colours and be more saturated than the tv it is replacing. So my comment on FTA being brighter and more vibrant stands and is correct. Did you really just do that? I think you really just did that. Wow. ryballs writes.. LOL you're just making stuff up now. Mate I wasn't saying that FTA content will be displayed at 1. I was saying that the light output has increased significantly. If you opt for the Dynamic mode (like most people do) it will almost certainly be brighter on average than the run of the mill non HDR tv when watching all content. Neo. G writes.. Did you really just do that? I think you really just did that. Wow. Would you like me to cut and paste it for confirmation? Would you like me to cut and paste it for confirmation? I'm going to print it and hang it on my wall, it was quite a manoeuvre. Thanks, I aim to please. Hmm I don't think so. I'd bet majority of existing LCD owners on here don't watch at maximum brightness already. I don't care if average Joe the TV noob does, that's irrelevant here and it still won't be 1. More brightness on non- HDR content just means more banding and a destroyed black level on LCD.. Ok, let's all wait till the pro reviews are out. Mark my words, they'll all be saying how incredibly bright they are in all modes : )Cheers. Any information on Australian release month yet for any 2. Anyone know the spec for the chip/processor that Sony will be using for 2. Android TV OS? I heard the 2. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - Official Teaser Trailer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |